I agree totally ..This nonsense started years ago with the Tories in power....now, no politician comes up with this crap , it's all the machine .....after my long conversation with the Top Provincial Biologist about Prussian Carp , we moved On to Walleyes etc ....As unbelievable as this may seem , i said very little . I listened , no surprises , 1 ....under funded ... 2 .....C&R is the only way , to maintain populations . 3.... Tags are a necessary Tax .... So we need to change the Govt , elect people who will . call BS to the biologists. We need our own Fishing Suzuki . I read , I hear, people talk ......" The Kings Deer " Feudal system still in place .....
Walleyes , this is an interesting situation . I have fished Mille Lacs lake in Minnesota 3 times . I found it to be the equal of any lake in Manitoba or NW Ontario . A post on Walleye Central caught my eye last year , about the lake being closed . Since I can remember Minnesota has spent millions yearly in walleye stocking. Puzzling to say the least . https://www.twincities.com/2018/03/19/mille-lacs-faces-3rd-catch-and-release-only-walleye-season/
Here it seems that the biologists are so scared that a hook might escape a walleye they let them populate to the point where it's the walleye themselves that are throwing the ecosystems out of balance. We have a real problem in Alberta imho, and we need a fresh perspective in management.
Here is another article that I thought was quite good.http://www.startribune.com/why-stocking-fish-isn-t-the-answer-to-walleye-woes-on-mille-lacs/301328271/They address why slot my not be so good and why stocking might not be a good choice.I also liked that they addressed where you put the size limits can dramatically affect the male population, which in this case seems to lead to a significant affect. ie lots of spawning females not a lot of off spring though. I have found that the 43 - 50 slot (B tags) takes out greater than 90% males and given fish are broadcast fertilizers this can certainly lead to problems.