I really wonder about some of them. I envision either a 12 yr old, or a second year arts student as the usual culprit. Maybe a reyrson prof, it's hard to discern between that and a 12 yr old.Either that or an ignattiaf, or a holland, I understand they both have a lot of time on their hands these days.
And what do you think of "internet bigots"?bigot [ˈbɪgət]na person who is intolerant of any ideas other than his or her own, esp on religion, politics, or race
Screw them and their tags..
What about "internet shit disturbers"?shit disturber — n informal ( Canadian ) a person who enjoys causing controversy or upsetting people usage Although considered vulgar, this phrase is nonetheless commonly used and is generally not thought offensive enough to be considered taboo At no point did Bruce say he was intolerant of anything.
LOL! People never "say they are intolerant" they show it in what they say and do.a 12 yr old, or a second year arts student as the usual culprit - See more at: http://albertasportsman.com/index.php?action=post;quote=26133;topic=3726.0#sthash.THYE0895.dpufThis implies that all 12 year olds and second year arts students are misbehaviours. Anytime you lump a group together and say "they are..." you are displaying prejudice.
Sometimes I think you legitimately want to contribute to the discussions in this forum but then you make posts that are obviously meant to be antagonistic. Anyway, Bruce put a smile at the end of his post and I took it as a 'tongue in cheek comment', you on the other hand, seem to always take every post to a different level. I feel sorry for you if you believe everyone always have negative intentions. Have fun with that.